Big Ten · #31 of 138

UCLA

Implied Strength+10.7vs. FBS average · ±3.6
Record2–0through completed games
Playoff Odds10%make the 12-team field
Conference Title1%win Big Ten
Strength of Schedule47thof 138 FBS teams

Schedule lens

What matters next

The headline numbers are above. Here is where the season starts to take shape.

Team identity

Where the strength lives

New head coach in 2026

Offense projects as the stronger unit by 1.1 rating points.

Offense#25
+5.9vs. FBS average
+5.9
2025 PPA/play0.12 #96 FBSSuccess rate41.2% #81 FBS
Defense#36
+4.8vs. FBS average
+4.8
2025 PPA/play allowed0.26 #126 FBSSuccess rate allowed49.8% #135 FBS

2025 PPA (predicted points added per play) and success rate. How this split works →

Season outlook · 50,000 simulations

How UCLA's 2026 could unfold

The current projection is 8–4 (7.9 expected wins), with a 10% chance to reach the playoff. The distribution below shows how often each regular-season win total appeared across the schedule-aware simulations.

Range of outcomes

Projected win distribution

50,000 simulated seasons
Most common and median 8 winsCentral 80% 6–10 winsBowl eligible 94.3%
1%4%12%21%25%22%11%3%Market 6.3<55678910>10
Simulated (schedule-aware)Central 80% rangeMarket win total

Postseason path

2026 playoff outlook

50,000 simulations
10.4%Make the 12-team field

Still outside the median outcome across the schedule-aware simulations.

How the field is reached10.4% total
Auto-bid0.6%
At-large9.8%
Outside field89.6%
Conference title0.6%

What could move the outlook

Biggest questions

Unresolved does not mean negative. A point estimate appears only when the historical evidence supports one.

Coaching

How quickly does the new coaching staff take shape?

A first-year staff creates early-season implementation uncertainty even though the team-level baseline already incorporates the available preseason information.

The opener study found about a one-point market shade toward a retained coach, with a wide uncertainty range.
Projection contextRoster, continuity, and market inputsView details

The market win total, returning production, coaching continuity, transfer talent, and recent NFL production help explain the evidence surrounding this projection.

Returning Production57.0%share of prior-year PPA returning for 2026
Coaching ContinuityNew HCfirst season under a new head coach
2026 Transfer Class5thof 138 FBS teams by combined portal talentHeavy portal activity
Recent NFL Draft Production72ndof 138 FBS teams by NFL talent produced
Market win total6.3Consensus preseason line
Final · Sep 5Suggested side did not cover
OV Win49%45
Spread:CAL -0.5vs.UCLA -2.5
UCLA at California · Berkeley, CA · California Memorial Stadium
Final · Sep 12
OV Win72%28
Spread:UCLA -7.5vs.UCLA -12
San Diego State at UCLA · Pasadena, CA · Rose Bowl
8:00 PM · Sep 19
Spread:UCLA -15vs.UCLA -14
Purdue at UCLA · Pasadena, CA · Rose Bowl
1:30 PM · Sep 26
Spread:UCLA -4.5vs.
UCLA at Maryland · College Park, MD · SECU Stadium
9:00 PM · Oct 9
Spread:ORE -19.5vs.
UCLA at Oregon · Eugene, OR · Autzen Stadium
9:00 PM · Oct 16
Spread:UCLA -7vs.
Wisconsin at UCLA · Pasadena, CA · Rose Bowl
9:00 PM · Oct 23
Spread:UCLA -12.5vs.
Michigan State at UCLA · Pasadena, CA · Rose Bowl
9:00 PM · Oct 30
Spread:UCLA -25vs.
Nevada at UCLA · Pasadena, CA · Rose Bowl
11:00 PM · Nov 6
Spread:UCLA -2.5vs.
UCLA at Minnesota · Minneapolis, MN · Huntington Bank Stadium
6:00 PM · Nov 13
Spread:UCLA -5.5vs.
Illinois at UCLA · Pasadena, CA · Rose Bowl
12:00 AM · Nov 21
Spread:MICH -7vs.
UCLA at Michigan · Ann Arbor, MI · Michigan Stadium
9:00 PM · Nov 27
OV Win67%
Spread:USC -5.5vs.USC -10.5
USC at UCLA · Pasadena, CA · Rose Bowl

Pregame evidence · 2022–25

UCLA through the lens

The OV Line is the aggregate-rating baseline. The market gap shows where the game-level consensus differed, while identified Factors show how much of that difference our research may explain. ATS records are descriptive context—not a claim that OV should outperform the market.

Market ATS45%19–23 against consensus
Average line gap3.0 pts60% inside 3 points · 25 of 42
Factor coverage29%12 of 42 games
Factor signals83% aligned10 of 12 individual observations · 0 neutral
Historical sample42 gamesmarket-covered games from 2022–25

Explanatory history

Factors present in UCLA games

FactorGamesAverage estimateAligned with marketResearch status
Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty72.0 pts toward UCLA71%5 of 7 directional casesSupported · wider uncertainty
Rest Differential5No net direction100%5 of 5 directional casesSupported
Underlying recordInspect all 42 historical gamesView games
SeasonGameOV baselineMarketMarket gapIdentified adjustmentRemaining gapResultMarket ATSFactors
2025 · W14at USCAwayUCLA +23.5UCLA +21.51.8 pts toward UCLA3.0 pts toward UCLA1.1 pts toward opponentsL 10–29WLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2025 · W13vs. WashingtonHomeUCLA +12UCLA +10.51.4 pts toward UCLANone identified1.4 pts toward UCLAL 14–48LNone identified
2025 · W12at Ohio StateAwayUCLA +34UCLA +330.9 pts toward UCLA4.8 pts toward UCLA3.9 pts toward opponentsL 10–48LLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2025 · W11vs. NebraskaHomeUCLA +8.5UCLA -210.7 pts toward UCLA1.1 pts toward UCLA9.7 pts toward UCLAL 21–28LRest Differential
2025 · W9at IndianaAwayUCLA +27.5UCLA +27.50.2 pts toward UCLA3.6 pts toward UCLA3.4 pts toward opponentsL 6–56LLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2025 · W8vs. MarylandHomeUCLA -0.5UCLA -43.5 pts toward UCLANone identified3.5 pts toward UCLAW 20–17LNone identified
2025 · W7at Michigan StateAwayUCLA +9UCLA +71.8 pts toward UCLANone identified1.8 pts toward UCLAW 38–13WNone identified
2025 · W6vs. Penn StateHomeUCLA +25.5UCLA +24.51.1 pts toward UCLA3.3 pts toward UCLA2.2 pts toward opponentsW 42–37WLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2025 · W5at NorthwesternAwayUCLA +5UCLA +60.8 pts toward opponentsNone identified0.8 pts toward opponentsL 14–17WNone identified
2025 · W3vs. New MexicoHomeUCLA -20UCLA -15.54.3 pts toward opponentsNone identified4.3 pts toward opponentsL 10–35LNone identified
2025 · W2at UNLVAwayUCLA -1UCLA -2.51.6 pts toward UCLANone identified1.6 pts toward UCLAL 23–30LNone identified
2025 · W1vs. UtahHomeUCLA +4.5UCLA +6.51.9 pts toward opponentsNone identified1.9 pts toward opponentsL 10–43LNone identified
2024 · W13vs. USCHomeUCLA +9UCLA +4.54.4 pts toward UCLANone identified4.4 pts toward UCLAL 13–19LNone identified
2024 · W12at WashingtonAwayUCLA +9UCLA +54.2 pts toward UCLANone identified4.2 pts toward UCLAL 19–31LNone identified
2024 · W11vs. IowaHomeUCLA +10UCLA +6.53.4 pts toward UCLANone identified3.4 pts toward UCLAW 20–17WNone identified
2024 · W10at NebraskaAwayUCLA +10.5UCLA +7.53.2 pts toward UCLA1.7 pts toward UCLA1.4 pts toward UCLAW 27–20WRest Differential
2024 · W8at RutgersAwayUCLA +8.5UCLA +4.54.1 pts toward UCLANone identified4.1 pts toward UCLAW 35–32WNone identified
2024 · W7vs. MinnesotaHomeUCLA +4.5UCLA +3.51.0 pts toward UCLANone identified1.0 pts toward UCLAL 17–21LNone identified
2024 · W6at Penn StateAwayUCLA +26.5UCLA +29.52.9 pts toward opponents2.7 pts toward UCLA5.6 pts toward opponentsL 11–27WLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2024 · W5vs. OregonHomeUCLA +20.5UCLA +23.52.9 pts toward opponents1.7 pts toward opponents1.2 pts toward opponentsL 13–34WRest Differential
2024 · W4at LSUAwayUCLA +21UCLA +21.50.5 pts toward opponentsNone identified0.5 pts toward opponentsL 17–34WNone identified
2024 · W3vs. IndianaHomeUCLA +15.5UCLA +3.512.0 pts toward UCLA0.9 pts toward UCLA11.1 pts toward UCLAL 13–42LRest Differential
2023 · W13vs. CaliforniaHomeUCLA -11.5UCLA -9.51.8 pts toward opponentsNone identified1.8 pts toward opponentsL 7–33LNone identified
2023 · W12at USCAwayUCLA +9.5UCLA +54.7 pts toward UCLANone identified4.7 pts toward UCLAW 38–20WNone identified
2023 · W11vs. Arizona StateHomeUCLA -18.5UCLA -144.5 pts toward opponentsNone identified4.5 pts toward opponentsL 7–17LNone identified
2023 · W10at ArizonaAwayUCLA -3UCLA -2.50.7 pts toward opponentsNone identified0.7 pts toward opponentsL 10–27LNone identified
2023 · W9vs. ColoradoHomeUCLA -16UCLA -141.8 pts toward opponents1.8 pts toward opponentsNo net directionW 28–16LRest Differential
2023 · W8at StanfordAwayUCLA -19.5UCLA -172.6 pts toward opponentsNone identified2.6 pts toward opponentsW 42–7WNone identified
2023 · W7at Oregon StateAwayUCLA +4.5UCLA +3.50.8 pts toward UCLANone identified0.8 pts toward UCLAL 24–36LNone identified
2023 · W6vs. Washington StateHomeUCLA -7UCLA -3.53.6 pts toward opponentsNone identified3.6 pts toward opponentsW 25–17WNone identified
2023 · W4at UtahAwayUCLA -4UCLA +37.1 pts toward opponentsNone identified7.1 pts toward opponentsL 7–14LNone identified
2023 · W3vs. North Carolina CentralHomeUCLA -38UCLA -352.9 pts toward opponents0.3 pts toward UCLA3.1 pts toward opponentsW 59–7WLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2022 · W13at CaliforniaAwayUCLA -10UCLA -11.51.3 pts toward UCLANone identified1.3 pts toward UCLAW 35–28LNone identified
2022 · W12vs. USCHomeUCLA +3.5UCLA +2.51.1 pts toward UCLANone identified1.1 pts toward UCLAL 45–48LNone identified
2022 · W11vs. ArizonaHomeUCLA -15.5UCLA -204.7 pts toward UCLANone identified4.7 pts toward UCLAL 28–34LNone identified
2022 · W10at Arizona StateAwayUCLA -11UCLA -110.1 pts toward opponentsNone identified0.1 pts toward opponentsW 50–36WNone identified
2022 · W9vs. StanfordHomeUCLA -12UCLA -16.54.5 pts toward UCLANone identified4.5 pts toward UCLAW 38–13WNone identified
2022 · W8at OregonAwayUCLA +5.5UCLA +71.3 pts toward opponentsNone identified1.3 pts toward opponentsL 30–45LNone identified
2022 · W6vs. UtahHomeUCLA +8.5UCLA +35.3 pts toward UCLANone identified5.3 pts toward UCLAW 42–32WNone identified
2022 · W5vs. WashingtonHomeUCLA +1.5UCLA +2.51.1 pts toward opponentsNone identified1.1 pts toward opponentsW 40–32WNone identified
2022 · W4at ColoradoAwayUCLA -14.5UCLA -227.6 pts toward UCLANone identified7.6 pts toward UCLAW 45–17WNone identified
2022 · W2vs. Alabama StateHomeUCLA -49UCLA -48.50.4 pts toward opponents3.5 pts toward opponents3.0 pts toward UCLAW 45–7LLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty

Sample: 42 market-covered games from 2022–25. Identified adjustments are rough sums of the Factors shown and are not a replacement betting line. Remaining gap is market consensus minus the OV baseline and identified adjustments. A push means the team’s scoring margin exactly matched the market line.