Offense#60
+0.8vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play0.12 #93 FBSSuccess rate40.7% #89 FBS
ACC · #62 of 138
California
Implied Strength+1.6vs. FBS average · ±3.6
Record1–1through completed games
Bowl Eligibility56%reach six wins
Strength of Schedule55thof 138 FBS teams
Schedule lens
What matters next
The headline numbers are above. Here is where the season starts to take shape.
Next matchupvs. WagnerWeek 3 · OV Line CAL -40 · >99.9% win chance →Toughest remaining test#26 SMUWeek 8 · 15% site win chance · View matchup →
Team identity
Where the strength lives
New head coach in 2026
The model sees a balanced team, with neither unit separating meaningfully from the other.
Defense#60
+0.7vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play allowed0.16 #75 FBSSuccess rate allowed42.0% #78 FBS
2025 PPA (predicted points added per play) and success rate. How this split works →
Build Your Ratings
Who would win on a neutral field?
Pick the team you think is better. Your answers help build your personal ratings.
VS
Looks like you’re high on this year.
Want to explore new teams or keep comparing ?
Stored only in this browser -- nothing is sent anywhere.
Season outlook · 50,000 simulations
How California's 2026 could unfold
The current projection is 6–6 (5.8 expected wins), with a 1% chance to reach the playoff. The distribution below shows how often each regular-season win total appeared across the schedule-aware simulations.
Range of outcomes
Projected win distribution
Most common and median 6 winsCentral 80% 4–8 winsBowl eligible 56.0%
Simulated (schedule-aware)Central 80% rangeMarket win total
Postseason path
2026 playoff outlook
0.6%Make the 12-team field
Still outside the median outcome across the schedule-aware simulations.
How the field is reached0.6% total
Auto-bid0.3%
At-large0.3%
Outside field99.4%
What could move the outlook
Biggest questions
Unresolved does not mean negative. A point estimate appears only when the historical evidence supports one.
How quickly does the new coaching staff take shape?
A first-year staff creates early-season implementation uncertainty even though the team-level baseline already incorporates the available preseason information.
The opener study found about a one-point market shade toward a retained coach, with a wide uncertainty range.Projection contextRoster, continuity, and market inputsView details
The market win total, returning production, coaching continuity, transfer talent, and recent NFL production help explain the evidence surrounding this projection.
Returning Production58.3%share of prior-year PPA returning for 2026
Coaching ContinuityNew HCfirst season under a new head coach
2026 Transfer Class16thof 138 FBS teams by combined portal talentHeavy portal activity
Recent NFL Draft Production60thof 138 FBS teams by NFL talent produced
Market win total6.2Consensus preseason line
Final · Sep 5Suggested side did not cover
UCLA at California · Berkeley, CA · California Memorial Stadium
Pregame evidence · 2022–25
California through the lens
The OV Line is the aggregate-rating baseline. The market gap shows where the game-level consensus differed, while identified Factors show how much of that difference our research may explain. ATS records are descriptive context—not a claim that OV should outperform the market.
Market ATS50%22–22 against consensus
Average line gap3.2 pts61% inside 3 points · 27 of 44
Factor coverage27%12 of 44 games
Factor signals42% aligned5 of 12 individual observations · 0 neutral
Historical sample44 gamesmarket-covered games from 2022–25
Explanatory history
Factors present in California games
| Factor | Games | Average estimate | Aligned with market | Research status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rest Differential | 6 | 0.4 pts toward opponents | 50%3 of 6 directional cases | Supported |
| Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty | 5 | 1.6 pts toward California | 40%2 of 5 directional cases | Supported · wider uncertainty |
| Season-Opening Quarterback Experience | 1 | 0.9 pts toward opponents | 0%0 of 1 directional cases | Research candidate |
Underlying recordInspect all 44 historical gamesView games
| Season | Game | OV baseline | Market | Market gap | Identified adjustment | Remaining gap | Result | Market ATS | Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · W14 | vs. SMUHome | California +14 | California +13.5 | 0.3 pts toward California | None identified | 0.3 pts toward California | W 38–35 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W13 | at StanfordAway | California -2.5 | California -4.5 | 2.0 pts toward California | None identified | 2.0 pts toward California | L 10–31 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W11 | at LouisvilleAway | California +20 | California +18.5 | 1.4 pts toward California | None identified | 1.4 pts toward California | W 29–26 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W10 | vs. VirginiaHome | California +6 | California +6.5 | 0.5 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.5 pts toward opponents | L 21–31 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W9 | at Virginia TechAway | California +4.5 | California +6 | 1.6 pts toward opponents | 1.0 pts toward opponents | 0.6 pts toward opponents | L 34–42 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W8 | vs. North CarolinaHome | California -4 | California -7.5 | 3.3 pts toward California | None identified | 3.3 pts toward California | W 21–18 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W6 | vs. DukeHome | California +3.5 | California +3.5 | 0.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.2 pts toward opponents | L 21–45 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W5 | at Boston CollegeAway | California +8.5 | California +6 | 2.4 pts toward California | 1.1 pts toward opponents | 3.4 pts toward California | W 28–24 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W4 | at San Diego StateAway | California -9 | California -14 | 4.8 pts toward California | 1.1 pts toward opponents | 5.9 pts toward California | L 0–34 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W3 | vs. MinnesotaHome | California +8 | California +3 | 5.0 pts toward California | None identified | 5.0 pts toward California | W 27–14 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W2 | vs. Texas SouthernHome | California -45 | California -44.5 | 0.7 pts toward opponents | 1.0 pts toward opponents | 0.3 pts toward California | W 35–3 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2025 · W1 | at Oregon StateAway | California +3 | California -2.5 | 5.6 pts toward California | 0.9 pts toward opponents | 6.5 pts toward California | W 34–15 | W | Season-Opening Quarterback Experience |
| 2024 · W13 | vs. StanfordHome | California -17 | California -15 | 2.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.2 pts toward opponents | W 24–21 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W12 | vs. SyracuseHome | California -7.5 | California -10.5 | 3.2 pts toward California | None identified | 3.2 pts toward California | L 25–33 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W11 | at Wake ForestAway | California -9 | California -7 | 2.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.2 pts toward opponents | W 46–36 | W | None identified |
| 2024 · W9 | vs. Oregon StateHome | California -12.5 | California -13 | 0.3 pts toward California | None identified | 0.3 pts toward California | W 44–7 | W | None identified |
| 2024 · W8 | vs. NC StateHome | California -9.5 | California -9.5 | 0.2 pts toward California | None identified | 0.2 pts toward California | L 23–24 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W7 | at PittsburghAway | California +7 | California +3.5 | 3.7 pts toward California | None identified | 3.7 pts toward California | L 15–17 | W | None identified |
| 2024 · W6 | vs. MiamiHome | California +16.5 | California +10 | 6.6 pts toward California | 0.9 pts toward California | 5.7 pts toward California | L 38–39 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2024 · W4 | at Florida StateAway | California +8 | California +3 | 4.9 pts toward California | None identified | 4.9 pts toward California | L 9–14 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W2 | at AuburnAway | California +28 | California +12.5 | 15.7 pts toward California | 2.8 pts toward California | 12.9 pts toward California | W 21–14 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2024 · W1 | vs. UC DavisHome | California -23.5 | California -20.5 | 3.0 pts toward opponents | 2.5 pts toward California | 5.5 pts toward opponents | W 31–13 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2023 · W13 | at UCLAAway | California +11.5 | California +9.5 | 1.8 pts toward California | None identified | 1.8 pts toward California | W 33–7 | W | None identified |
| 2023 · W12 | at StanfordAway | California -9 | California -6.5 | 2.7 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.7 pts toward opponents | W 27–15 | W | None identified |
| 2023 · W11 | vs. Washington StateHome | California -0.5 | California -1.5 | 0.8 pts toward California | None identified | 0.8 pts toward California | W 42–39 | W | None identified |
| 2023 · W10 | at OregonAway | California +21 | California +25.5 | 4.4 pts toward opponents | 2.1 pts toward California | 6.5 pts toward opponents | L 19–63 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2023 · W9 | vs. USCHome | California +14 | California +10.5 | 3.3 pts toward California | 1.1 pts toward California | 2.2 pts toward California | L 49–50 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2023 · W7 | at UtahAway | California +11.5 | California +9.5 | 2.2 pts toward California | 1.1 pts toward opponents | 3.3 pts toward California | L 14–34 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2023 · W6 | vs. Oregon StateHome | California +11.5 | California +7.5 | 4.2 pts toward California | None identified | 4.2 pts toward California | L 40–52 | L | None identified |
| 2023 · W5 | vs. Arizona StateHome | California -20 | California -12.5 | 7.5 pts toward opponents | None identified | 7.5 pts toward opponents | W 24–21 | L | None identified |
| 2023 · W4 | at WashingtonAway | California +18 | California +20.5 | 2.6 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.6 pts toward opponents | L 32–59 | L | None identified |
| 2023 · W3 | vs. IdahoHome | California -29.5 | California -14.5 | 15.1 pts toward opponents | 1.3 pts toward California | 16.4 pts toward opponents | W 31–17 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2023 · W2 | vs. AuburnHome | California -3 | California +5 | 8.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 8.2 pts toward opponents | L 10–14 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W13 | vs. UCLAHome | California +10 | California +11.5 | 1.3 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.3 pts toward opponents | L 28–35 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W12 | vs. StanfordHome | California -5 | California -5 | 0.2 pts toward California | None identified | 0.2 pts toward California | W 27–20 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W11 | at Oregon StateAway | California +11.5 | California +11.5 | 0.2 pts toward California | None identified | 0.2 pts toward California | L 10–38 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W10 | at USCAway | California +19.5 | California +21 | 1.5 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.5 pts toward opponents | L 35–41 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W9 | vs. OregonHome | California +14.5 | California +17 | 2.3 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.3 pts toward opponents | L 24–42 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W8 | vs. WashingtonHome | California +9 | California +7.5 | 1.6 pts toward California | None identified | 1.6 pts toward California | L 21–28 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W7 | at ColoradoAway | California -14 | California -15 | 0.9 pts toward California | None identified | 0.9 pts toward California | L 13–20 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W5 | at Washington StateAway | California +7 | California +4 | 2.9 pts toward California | None identified | 2.9 pts toward California | L 9–28 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W4 | vs. ArizonaHome | California -4 | California -3.5 | 0.4 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.4 pts toward opponents | W 49–31 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W3 | at Notre DameAway | California +18 | California +13.5 | 4.7 pts toward California | None identified | 4.7 pts toward California | L 17–24 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W1 | vs. UC DavisHome | California -18.5 | California -14 | 4.4 pts toward opponents | None identified | 4.4 pts toward opponents | W 34–13 | W | None identified |
Sample: 44 market-covered games from 2022–25. Identified adjustments are rough sums of the Factors shown and are not a replacement betting line. Remaining gap is market consensus minus the OV baseline and identified adjustments. A push means the team’s scoring margin exactly matched the market line.