Offense#26
+5.8vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play0.25 #22 FBSSuccess rate43.3% #54 FBS
ACC · #26 of 138
SMU
Implied Strength+12.2vs. FBS average · ±3.9
Record2–0through completed games
Playoff Odds27%make the 12-team field
Conference Title13%win ACC
Strength of Schedule63rdof 138 FBS teams
Schedule lens
What matters next
The headline numbers are above. Here is where the season starts to take shape.
Next matchupat LouisvilleWeek 3 · OV Line SMU +2 · 44% win chance →Toughest remaining test#5 Notre DameWeek 12 · 9% site win chance · View matchup →
Team identity
Where the strength lives
The model sees a balanced team, with neither unit separating meaningfully from the other.
Defense#26
+6.4vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play allowed0.03 #11 FBSSuccess rate allowed39.6% #47 FBS
2025 PPA (predicted points added per play) and success rate. How this split works →
Build Your Ratings
Who would win on a neutral field?
Pick the team you think is better. Your answers help build your personal ratings.
VS
Looks like you’re high on this year.
Want to explore new teams or keep comparing ?
Stored only in this browser -- nothing is sent anywhere.
Season outlook · 50,000 simulations
How SMU's 2026 could unfold
The current projection is 9–3 (9.0 expected wins), with a 27% chance to reach the playoff. The distribution below shows how often each regular-season win total appeared across the schedule-aware simulations.
Range of outcomes
Projected win distribution
Most common and median 9 winsCentral 80% 7–11 winsBowl eligible 99.0%Undefeated 1.7%
Simulated (schedule-aware)Central 80% rangeMarket win total
Postseason path
2026 playoff outlook
26.6%Make the 12-team field
Still outside the median outcome across the schedule-aware simulations.
How the field is reached26.6% total
Auto-bid12.6%
At-large14.0%
Outside field73.4%
Conference title12.6%
What could move the outlook
Biggest questions
Unresolved does not mean negative. A point estimate appears only when the historical evidence supports one.
No major preseason uncertainty signals currently clear the display threshold for SMU. We will update this view as matchup and in-season evidence develops.
Projection contextRoster, continuity, and market inputsView details
The market win total, returning production, coaching continuity, transfer talent, and recent NFL production help explain the evidence surrounding this projection.
Returning Production56.9%share of prior-year PPA returning for 2026
2026 Transfer Class88thof 138 FBS teams by combined portal talent
Recent NFL Draft Production61stof 138 FBS teams by NFL talent produced
Market win total8.8Consensus preseason line
Pregame evidence · 2022–25
SMU through the lens
The OV Line is the aggregate-rating baseline. The market gap shows where the game-level consensus differed, while identified Factors show how much of that difference our research may explain. ATS records are descriptive context—not a claim that OV should outperform the market.
Market ATS39%7–11 against consensus
Average line gap3.4 pts50% inside 3 points · 9 of 18
Factor coverage44%8 of 18 games
Factor signals89% aligned8 of 9 individual observations · 0 neutral
Historical sample18 gamesmarket-covered games from 2022–25
Explanatory history
Factors present in SMU games
| Factor | Games | Average estimate | Aligned with market | Research status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rest Differential | 5 | 1.0 pts toward opponents | 100%5 of 5 directional cases | Supported |
| Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty | 4 | 4.3 pts toward opponents | 75%3 of 4 directional cases | Supported · wider uncertainty |
Underlying recordInspect all 18 historical gamesView games
| Season | Game | OV baseline | Market | Market gap | Identified adjustment | Remaining gap | Result | Market ATS | Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · W14 | at CaliforniaAway | SMU -14 | SMU -13.5 | 0.3 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.3 pts toward opponents | L 35–38 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W13 | vs. LouisvilleHome | SMU -2 | SMU -4 | 2.0 pts toward SMU | 1.0 pts toward SMU | 1.0 pts toward SMU | W 38–6 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W11 | at Boston CollegeAway | SMU -13 | SMU -10.5 | 2.4 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.4 pts toward opponents | W 45–13 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W10 | vs. MiamiHome | SMU +5.5 | SMU +8.5 | 3.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 3.2 pts toward opponents | W 26–20 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W9 | at Wake ForestAway | SMU -11 | SMU -5.5 | 5.5 pts toward opponents | 1.1 pts toward opponents | 4.4 pts toward opponents | L 12–13 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W8 | at ClemsonAway | SMU +10.5 | SMU +3.5 | 6.8 pts toward SMU | None identified | 6.8 pts toward SMU | W 35–24 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W7 | vs. StanfordHome | SMU -23 | SMU -19.5 | 3.5 pts toward opponents | 4.6 pts toward opponents | 1.1 pts toward SMU | W 34–10 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow UncertaintyRest Differential |
| 2025 · W4 | at TCUAway | SMU +9 | SMU +6.5 | 2.5 pts toward SMU | None identified | 2.5 pts toward SMU | L 24–35 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W3 | at Missouri StateAway | SMU -24.5 | SMU -28.5 | 4.1 pts toward SMU | 3.1 pts toward opponents | 7.2 pts toward SMU | W 28–10 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2025 · W2 | vs. BaylorHome | SMU -0.5 | SMU -3 | 2.1 pts toward SMU | None identified | 2.1 pts toward SMU | L 45–48 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W1 | vs. East Texas A&MHome | SMU -52.5 | SMU -51 | 1.5 pts toward opponents | 3.0 pts toward opponents | 1.5 pts toward SMU | W 42–13 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2022 · W13 | vs. MemphisHome | SMU -0.5 | SMU -4.5 | 3.9 pts toward SMU | None identified | 3.9 pts toward SMU | W 34–31 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W10 | vs. HoustonHome | SMU -3.5 | SMU -3.5 | 0.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.2 pts toward opponents | W 77–63 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W8 | vs. CincinnatiHome | SMU +1.5 | SMU +3.5 | 1.9 pts toward opponents | 1.6 pts toward opponents | 0.4 pts toward opponents | L 27–29 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2022 · W6 | at UCFAway | SMU +6.5 | SMU +3 | 3.5 pts toward SMU | None identified | 3.5 pts toward SMU | L 19–41 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W4 | vs. TCUHome | SMU -2.5 | SMU +2.5 | 5.1 pts toward opponents | 1.8 pts toward opponents | 3.4 pts toward opponents | L 34–42 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2022 · W3 | at MarylandAway | SMU +3.5 | SMU +3 | 0.7 pts toward SMU | None identified | 0.7 pts toward SMU | L 27–34 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W2 | vs. LamarHome | SMU -60.5 | SMU -48.5 | 11.9 pts toward opponents | 8.1 pts toward opponents | 3.8 pts toward opponents | W 45–16 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
Sample: 18 market-covered games from 2022–25. Identified adjustments are rough sums of the Factors shown and are not a replacement betting line. Remaining gap is market consensus minus the OV baseline and identified adjustments. A push means the team’s scoring margin exactly matched the market line.