Offense#7
+12.2vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play0.34 #4 FBSSuccess rate49.0% #8 FBS
Big Ten · #13 of 138
USC
Implied Strength+18.7vs. FBS average · ±3.0
Record3–0through completed games
Playoff Odds17%make the 12-team field
Conference Title2%win Big Ten
Strength of Schedule21stof 138 FBS teams
Schedule lens
What matters next
The headline numbers are above. Here is where the season starts to take shape.
Next matchupat RutgersWeek 3 · OV Line USC -19 · 93% win chance →Toughest remaining test#1 Ohio StateWeek 9 · 28% site win chance · View matchup →
Team identity
Where the strength lives
Offense projects as the stronger unit by 5.7 rating points.
Defense#25
+6.5vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play allowed0.15 #65 FBSSuccess rate allowed44.8% #117 FBS
2025 PPA (predicted points added per play) and success rate. How this split works →
Build Your Ratings
Who would win on a neutral field?
Pick the team you think is better. Your answers help build your personal ratings.
VS
Looks like you’re high on this year.
Want to explore new teams or keep comparing ?
Stored only in this browser -- nothing is sent anywhere.
Season outlook · 50,000 simulations
How USC's 2026 could unfold
The current projection is 8–4 (8.1 expected wins), with a 17% chance to reach the playoff. The distribution below shows how often each regular-season win total appeared across the schedule-aware simulations.
Range of outcomes
Projected win distribution
Most common and median 8 winsCentral 80% 6–10 winsBowl eligible 97.1%
Simulated (schedule-aware)Central 80% rangeMarket win total
Postseason path
2026 playoff outlook
17.0%Make the 12-team field
Still outside the median outcome across the schedule-aware simulations.
How the field is reached17.0% total
Auto-bid2.0%
At-large15.0%
Outside field83.0%
Conference title2.0%
What could move the outlook
Biggest questions
Unresolved does not mean negative. A point estimate appears only when the historical evidence supports one.
Replacing a high level of NFL-caliber production
USC ranks 24th of 138 teams in recent NFL draft production. The open question is how quickly the next group reproduces it.
Draft attrition is already included in the baseline. Broad roster reconstruction did not earn a separate historical point adjustment.Projection contextRoster, continuity, and market inputsView details
The market win total, returning production, coaching continuity, transfer talent, and recent NFL production help explain the evidence surrounding this projection.
Returning Production59.2%share of prior-year PPA returning for 2026
2026 Transfer Class125thof 138 FBS teams by combined portal talent
Recent NFL Draft Production24thof 138 FBS teams by NFL talent producedHeavy draft production
Market win total8.2Consensus preseason line
Final · Aug 29Suggested side covered
San José State at USC · Los Angeles, CA · Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum
Final · Sep 4Suggested side did not cover
Fresno State at USC · Los Angeles, CA · Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum
Pregame evidence · 2022–25
USC through the lens
The OV Line is the aggregate-rating baseline. The market gap shows where the game-level consensus differed, while identified Factors show how much of that difference our research may explain. ATS records are descriptive context—not a claim that OV should outperform the market.
Market ATS44%20–25 against consensus
Average line gap3.2 pts58% inside 3 points · 26 of 45
Factor coverage36%16 of 45 games
Factor signals76% aligned13 of 17 individual observations · 0 neutral
Historical sample45 gamesmarket-covered games from 2022–25
Explanatory history
Factors present in USC games
| Factor | Games | Average estimate | Aligned with market | Research status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty | 10 | 3.5 pts toward opponents | 90%9 of 10 directional cases | Supported · wider uncertainty |
| Rest Differential | 7 | 0.2 pts toward USC | 57%4 of 7 directional cases | Supported |
Underlying recordInspect all 45 historical gamesView games
| Season | Game | OV baseline | Market | Market gap | Identified adjustment | Remaining gap | Result | Market ATS | Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · W14 | vs. UCLAHome | USC -23.5 | USC -21.5 | 1.8 pts toward opponents | 3.0 pts toward opponents | 1.1 pts toward USC | W 29–10 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2025 · W13 | at OregonAway | USC +11.5 | USC +11 | 0.4 pts toward USC | None identified | 0.4 pts toward USC | L 27–42 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W12 | vs. IowaHome | USC -6 | USC -6.5 | 0.5 pts toward USC | None identified | 0.5 pts toward USC | W 26–21 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W11 | vs. NorthwesternHome | USC -20.5 | USC -14.5 | 5.9 pts toward opponents | 1.8 pts toward opponents | 4.0 pts toward opponents | W 38–17 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W10 | at NebraskaAway | USC -5.5 | USC -4.5 | 1.1 pts toward opponents | 1.7 pts toward USC | 2.8 pts toward opponents | W 21–17 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W8 | at Notre DameAway | USC +9.5 | USC +10.5 | 0.9 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.9 pts toward opponents | L 24–34 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W7 | vs. MichiganHome | USC -3.5 | USC -3 | 0.4 pts toward opponents | 1.0 pts toward USC | 1.4 pts toward opponents | W 31–13 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W5 | at IllinoisAway | USC -4.5 | USC -6.5 | 1.8 pts toward USC | None identified | 1.8 pts toward USC | L 32–34 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W4 | vs. Michigan StateHome | USC -20 | USC -18.5 | 1.4 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.4 pts toward opponents | W 45–31 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W3 | at PurdueAway | USC -23 | USC -20.5 | 2.6 pts toward opponents | 2.9 pts toward opponents | 0.3 pts toward USC | W 33–17 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2025 · W2 | vs. Georgia SouthernHome | USC -37.5 | USC -29 | 8.5 pts toward opponents | 5.5 pts toward opponents | 3.1 pts toward opponents | W 59–20 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2025 · W1 | vs. Missouri StateHome | USC -31.5 | USC -36.5 | 5.2 pts toward USC | 3.3 pts toward opponents | 8.4 pts toward USC | W 73–13 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2024 · W14 | vs. Notre DameHome | USC +8.5 | USC +7 | 1.5 pts toward USC | None identified | 1.5 pts toward USC | L 35–49 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W13 | at UCLAAway | USC -9 | USC -4.5 | 4.4 pts toward opponents | None identified | 4.4 pts toward opponents | W 19–13 | W | None identified |
| 2024 · W12 | vs. NebraskaHome | USC -11 | USC -6.5 | 4.3 pts toward opponents | None identified | 4.3 pts toward opponents | W 28–20 | W | None identified |
| 2024 · W10 | at WashingtonAway | USC -4.5 | USC -2 | 2.7 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.7 pts toward opponents | L 21–26 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W9 | vs. RutgersHome | USC -15.5 | USC -14 | 2.0 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.0 pts toward opponents | W 42–20 | W | None identified |
| 2024 · W8 | at MarylandAway | USC -10 | USC -6.5 | 3.6 pts toward opponents | None identified | 3.6 pts toward opponents | L 28–29 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W7 | vs. Penn StateHome | USC +4.5 | USC +3.5 | 1.2 pts toward USC | None identified | 1.2 pts toward USC | L 30–33 | W | None identified |
| 2024 · W6 | at MinnesotaAway | USC -10 | USC -8.5 | 1.6 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.6 pts toward opponents | L 17–24 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W5 | vs. WisconsinHome | USC -18 | USC -13.5 | 4.7 pts toward opponents | 1.8 pts toward opponents | 3.0 pts toward opponents | W 38–21 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2024 · W4 | at MichiganAway | USC -2 | USC -4 | 2.1 pts toward USC | 1.6 pts toward USC | 0.5 pts toward USC | L 24–27 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2024 · W1 | vs. LSUNeutral | USC +7.5 | USC +4 | 3.3 pts toward USC | None identified | 3.3 pts toward USC | W 27–20 | W | None identified |
| 2023 · W12 | vs. UCLAHome | USC -9.5 | USC -5 | 4.7 pts toward opponents | None identified | 4.7 pts toward opponents | L 20–38 | L | None identified |
| 2023 · W11 | at OregonAway | USC +10 | USC +16.5 | 6.6 pts toward opponents | None identified | 6.6 pts toward opponents | L 27–36 | W | None identified |
| 2023 · W10 | vs. WashingtonHome | USC +0.5 | USC +3 | 2.4 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.4 pts toward opponents | L 42–52 | L | None identified |
| 2023 · W9 | at CaliforniaAway | USC -14 | USC -10.5 | 3.3 pts toward opponents | 1.1 pts toward opponents | 2.2 pts toward opponents | W 50–49 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2023 · W8 | vs. UtahHome | USC -10 | USC -7 | 2.9 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.9 pts toward opponents | L 32–34 | L | None identified |
| 2023 · W7 | at Notre DameAway | USC -1 | USC +3 | 3.9 pts toward opponents | None identified | 3.9 pts toward opponents | L 20–48 | L | None identified |
| 2023 · W6 | vs. ArizonaHome | USC -23.5 | USC -21 | 2.6 pts toward opponents | 2.4 pts toward opponents | 0.2 pts toward opponents | W 43–41 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2023 · W5 | at ColoradoAway | USC -23.5 | USC -21.5 | 1.9 pts toward opponents | 2.4 pts toward opponents | 0.4 pts toward USC | W 48–41 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2023 · W4 | at Arizona StateAway | USC -39 | USC -34.5 | 4.5 pts toward opponents | 2.6 pts toward opponents | 1.9 pts toward opponents | W 42–28 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow UncertaintyRest Differential |
| 2023 · W2 | vs. StanfordHome | USC -34.5 | USC -28.5 | 6.1 pts toward opponents | 3.7 pts toward opponents | 2.3 pts toward opponents | W 56–10 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2022 · W14 | vs. UtahNeutral | USC +1 | USC -3 | 3.7 pts toward USC | None identified | 3.7 pts toward USC | L 24–47 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W13 | vs. Notre DameHome | USC -5.5 | USC -4.5 | 1.3 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.3 pts toward opponents | W 38–27 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W12 | at UCLAAway | USC -3.5 | USC -2.5 | 1.1 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.1 pts toward opponents | W 48–45 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W11 | vs. ColoradoHome | USC -34.5 | USC -34.5 | 0.2 pts toward opponents | 4.4 pts toward opponents | 4.2 pts toward USC | W 55–17 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2022 · W10 | vs. CaliforniaHome | USC -19.5 | USC -21 | 1.5 pts toward USC | None identified | 1.5 pts toward USC | W 41–35 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W9 | at ArizonaAway | USC -17.5 | USC -14 | 3.6 pts toward opponents | None identified | 3.6 pts toward opponents | W 45–37 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W7 | at UtahAway | USC +3.5 | USC +3.5 | 0.2 pts toward USC | None identified | 0.2 pts toward USC | L 42–43 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W6 | vs. Washington StateHome | USC -13.5 | USC -12.5 | 0.8 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.8 pts toward opponents | W 30–14 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W5 | vs. Arizona StateHome | USC -19 | USC -24.5 | 5.3 pts toward USC | None identified | 5.3 pts toward USC | W 42–25 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W4 | at Oregon StateAway | USC -6.5 | USC -5.5 | 1.0 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.0 pts toward opponents | W 17–14 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W3 | vs. Fresno StateHome | USC -18 | USC -12 | 6.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 6.2 pts toward opponents | W 45–17 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W2 | at StanfordAway | USC -28.5 | USC -9.5 | 19.0 pts toward opponents | 3.3 pts toward opponents | 15.7 pts toward opponents | W 41–28 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
Sample: 45 market-covered games from 2022–25. Identified adjustments are rough sums of the Factors shown and are not a replacement betting line. Remaining gap is market consensus minus the OV baseline and identified adjustments. A push means the team’s scoring margin exactly matched the market line.