Offense#18
+8.2vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play0.20 #47 FBSSuccess rate45.5% #33 FBS
Big Ten · #19 of 138
Michigan
Implied Strength+15.1vs. FBS average · ±3.6
Record2–0through completed games
Playoff Odds10%make the 12-team field
Conference Title1%win Big Ten
Strength of Schedule20thof 138 FBS teams
Schedule lens
What matters next
The headline numbers are above. Here is where the season starts to take shape.
Next matchupvs. UTEPWeek 3 · OV Line MICH -36.5 · >99.9% win chance →Toughest remaining test#1 Ohio StateWeek 13 · 10% site win chance · View matchup →
Team identity
Where the strength lives
New head coach in 2026
Offense projects as the stronger unit by 1.3 rating points.
Defense#23
+6.9vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play allowed0.11 #52 FBSSuccess rate allowed41.8% #70 FBS
2025 PPA (predicted points added per play) and success rate. How this split works →
Build Your Ratings
Who would win on a neutral field?
Pick the team you think is better. Your answers help build your personal ratings.
VS
Looks like you’re high on this year.
Want to explore new teams or keep comparing ?
Stored only in this browser -- nothing is sent anywhere.
Season outlook · 50,000 simulations
How Michigan's 2026 could unfold
The current projection is 8–4 (7.8 expected wins), with a 10% chance to reach the playoff. The distribution below shows how often each regular-season win total appeared across the schedule-aware simulations.
Range of outcomes
Projected win distribution
Most common and median 8 winsCentral 80% 6–9 winsBowl eligible 95.0%
Simulated (schedule-aware)Central 80% rangeMarket win total
Postseason path
2026 playoff outlook
9.8%Make the 12-team field
Still outside the median outcome across the schedule-aware simulations.
How the field is reached9.8% total
Auto-bid0.9%
At-large8.9%
Outside field90.2%
Conference title0.9%
What could move the outlook
Biggest questions
Unresolved does not mean negative. A point estimate appears only when the historical evidence supports one.
How quickly does the new coaching staff take shape?
A first-year staff creates early-season implementation uncertainty even though the team-level baseline already incorporates the available preseason information.
The opener study found about a one-point market shade toward a retained coach, with a wide uncertainty range.Replacing a high level of NFL-caliber production
Michigan ranks 19th of 138 teams in recent NFL draft production. The open question is how quickly the next group reproduces it.
Draft attrition is already included in the baseline. Broad roster reconstruction did not earn a separate historical point adjustment.Projection contextRoster, continuity, and market inputsView details
The market win total, returning production, coaching continuity, transfer talent, and recent NFL production help explain the evidence surrounding this projection.
Returning Production69.2%share of prior-year PPA returning for 2026
Coaching ContinuityNew HCfirst season under a new head coach
2026 Transfer Class87thof 138 FBS teams by combined portal talent
Recent NFL Draft Production19thof 138 FBS teams by NFL talent producedHeavy draft production
Market win total7.9Consensus preseason line
Pregame evidence · 2022–25
Michigan through the lens
The OV Line is the aggregate-rating baseline. The market gap shows where the game-level consensus differed, while identified Factors show how much of that difference our research may explain. ATS records are descriptive context—not a claim that OV should outperform the market.
Market ATS54%22–19–1 against consensus
Average line gap2.7 pts57% inside 3 points · 24 of 42
Factor coverage48%20 of 42 games
Factor signals74% aligned17 of 23 individual observations · 1 neutral
Historical sample42 gamesmarket-covered games from 2022–25
Explanatory history
Factors present in Michigan games
| Factor | Games | Average estimate | Aligned with market | Research status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty | 13 | 2.7 pts toward opponents | 77%10 of 13 directional cases | Supported · wider uncertainty |
| Rest Differential | 7 | 0.3 pts toward opponents | 57%4 of 7 directional cases | Supported |
| Neutral-Site Same-State Context | 2 | 1.7 pts toward opponents | 100%2 of 2 directional cases | Supported · wider uncertainty |
| Season Opener with a New Head Coach | 1 | No net direction | —0 of 0 directional cases | No separate adjustment |
| Season-Opening Quarterback Experience | 1 | 0.9 pts toward opponents | 100%1 of 1 directional cases | Research candidate |
Underlying recordInspect all 42 historical gamesView games
| Season | Game | OV baseline | Market | Market gap | Identified adjustment | Remaining gap | Result | Market ATS | Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · W14 | vs. Ohio StateHome | Michigan +11 | Michigan +9.5 | 1.6 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 1.6 pts toward Michigan | L 9–27 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W13 | at MarylandAway | Michigan -13 | Michigan -14 | 0.9 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 0.9 pts toward Michigan | W 45–20 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W12 | vs. NorthwesternNeutral | Michigan -14 | Michigan -10 | 4.2 pts toward opponents | 1.5 pts toward opponents | 2.7 pts toward opponents | W 24–22 | L | Neutral-Site Same-State Context |
| 2025 · W10 | vs. PurdueHome | Michigan -21.5 | Michigan -21 | 0.3 pts toward opponents | 2.7 pts toward opponents | 2.4 pts toward Michigan | W 21–16 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2025 · W9 | at Michigan StateAway | Michigan -13 | Michigan -13.5 | 0.4 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 0.4 pts toward Michigan | W 31–20 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W8 | vs. WashingtonHome | Michigan -7 | Michigan -4 | 3.1 pts toward opponents | None identified | 3.1 pts toward opponents | W 24–7 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W7 | at USCAway | Michigan +3.5 | Michigan +3 | 0.4 pts toward Michigan | 1.0 pts toward opponents | 1.4 pts toward Michigan | L 13–31 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W6 | vs. WisconsinHome | Michigan -17.5 | Michigan -17.5 | 0.1 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.1 pts toward opponents | W 24–10 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W4 | at NebraskaAway | Michigan +4.5 | Michigan -1.5 | 5.8 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 5.8 pts toward Michigan | W 30–27 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W3 | vs. Central MichiganHome | Michigan -28.5 | Michigan -27.5 | 0.9 pts toward opponents | 3.7 pts toward opponents | 2.8 pts toward Michigan | W 63–3 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2025 · W2 | at OklahomaAway | Michigan +7.5 | Michigan +3.5 | 3.8 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 3.8 pts toward Michigan | L 13–24 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W1 | vs. New MexicoHome | Michigan -38.5 | Michigan -34.5 | 3.9 pts toward opponents | 5.5 pts toward opponents | 1.6 pts toward Michigan | W 34–17 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow UncertaintySeason-Opening Quarterback ExperienceSeason Opener with a New Head Coach |
| 2024 · W14 | at Ohio StateAway | Michigan +24 | Michigan +20 | 3.9 pts toward Michigan | 2.4 pts toward Michigan | 1.5 pts toward Michigan | W 13–10 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2024 · W13 | vs. NorthwesternHome | Michigan -12 | Michigan -10.5 | 1.5 pts toward opponents | 1.1 pts toward Michigan | 2.5 pts toward opponents | W 50–6 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2024 · W11 | at IndianaAway | Michigan +11 | Michigan +14.5 | 3.5 pts toward opponents | None identified | 3.5 pts toward opponents | L 15–20 | W | None identified |
| 2024 · W10 | vs. OregonHome | Michigan +13.5 | Michigan +14.5 | 1.0 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.0 pts toward opponents | L 17–38 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W9 | vs. Michigan StateHome | Michigan -10.5 | Michigan -3.5 | 7.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 7.2 pts toward opponents | W 24–17 | W | None identified |
| 2024 · W8 | at IllinoisAway | Michigan -2 | Michigan -6 | 4.2 pts toward Michigan | 1.7 pts toward Michigan | 2.4 pts toward Michigan | L 7–21 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2024 · W6 | at WashingtonAway | Michigan -3 | Michigan +1.5 | 4.7 pts toward opponents | None identified | 4.7 pts toward opponents | L 17–27 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W5 | vs. MinnesotaHome | Michigan -10.5 | Michigan -10.5 | 0.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.2 pts toward opponents | W 27–24 | L | None identified |
| 2024 · W4 | vs. USCHome | Michigan +2 | Michigan +4 | 2.1 pts toward opponents | 1.6 pts toward opponents | 0.5 pts toward opponents | W 27–24 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2024 · W2 | vs. TexasHome | Michigan +16 | Michigan +6.5 | 9.4 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 9.4 pts toward Michigan | L 12–31 | L | None identified |
| 2023 · W14 | vs. IowaNeutral | Michigan -24.5 | Michigan -21 | 3.5 pts toward opponents | 2.5 pts toward opponents | 1.0 pts toward opponents | W 26–0 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2023 · W13 | vs. Ohio StateHome | Michigan -3.5 | Michigan -3 | 0.7 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.7 pts toward opponents | W 30–24 | W | None identified |
| 2023 · W12 | at MarylandAway | Michigan -20.5 | Michigan -17.5 | 3.1 pts toward opponents | None identified | 3.1 pts toward opponents | W 31–24 | L | None identified |
| 2023 · W11 | at Penn StateAway | Michigan -3.5 | Michigan -4.5 | 0.9 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 0.9 pts toward Michigan | W 24–15 | W | None identified |
| 2023 · W10 | vs. PurdueHome | Michigan -31 | Michigan -32.5 | 1.3 pts toward Michigan | 2.2 pts toward opponents | 3.5 pts toward Michigan | W 41–13 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow UncertaintyRest Differential |
| 2023 · W8 | at Michigan StateAway | Michigan -26.5 | Michigan -25.5 | 0.9 pts toward opponents | 2.6 pts toward opponents | 1.7 pts toward Michigan | W 49–0 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2023 · W7 | vs. IndianaHome | Michigan -32.5 | Michigan -33.5 | 0.8 pts toward Michigan | 5.3 pts toward opponents | 6.1 pts toward Michigan | W 52–7 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow UncertaintyRest Differential |
| 2023 · W6 | at MinnesotaAway | Michigan -17 | Michigan -18.5 | 1.4 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 1.4 pts toward Michigan | W 52–10 | W | None identified |
| 2023 · W5 | at NebraskaAway | Michigan -21.5 | Michigan -17 | 4.7 pts toward opponents | 2.2 pts toward opponents | 2.5 pts toward opponents | W 45–7 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2023 · W4 | vs. RutgersHome | Michigan -19.5 | Michigan -24 | 4.7 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 4.7 pts toward Michigan | W 31–7 | P | None identified |
| 2022 · W14 | vs. PurdueNeutral | Michigan -19 | Michigan -16 | 3.2 pts toward opponents | 1.8 pts toward opponents | 1.4 pts toward opponents | W 43–22 | W | Neutral-Site Same-State Context |
| 2022 · W13 | at Ohio StateAway | Michigan +11.5 | Michigan +9 | 2.3 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 2.3 pts toward Michigan | W 45–23 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W12 | vs. IllinoisHome | Michigan -18 | Michigan -17 | 1.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.2 pts toward opponents | W 19–17 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W11 | vs. NebraskaHome | Michigan -30 | Michigan -30.5 | 0.7 pts toward Michigan | 3.5 pts toward opponents | 4.2 pts toward Michigan | W 34–3 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2022 · W10 | at RutgersAway | Michigan -27 | Michigan -26.5 | 0.4 pts toward opponents | 3.1 pts toward opponents | 2.7 pts toward Michigan | W 52–17 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2022 · W9 | vs. Michigan StateHome | Michigan -21 | Michigan -22.5 | 1.3 pts toward Michigan | None identified | 1.3 pts toward Michigan | W 29–7 | L | None identified |
| 2022 · W7 | vs. Penn StateHome | Michigan -9 | Michigan -7 | 2.0 pts toward opponents | 1.7 pts toward opponents | 0.3 pts toward opponents | W 41–17 | W | Rest Differential |
| 2022 · W6 | at IndianaAway | Michigan -25.5 | Michigan -23.5 | 1.9 pts toward opponents | 2.9 pts toward opponents | 0.9 pts toward Michigan | W 31–10 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2022 · W5 | at IowaAway | Michigan -16 | Michigan -10.5 | 5.3 pts toward opponents | None identified | 5.3 pts toward opponents | W 27–14 | W | None identified |
| 2022 · W4 | vs. MarylandHome | Michigan -27 | Michigan -17 | 10.1 pts toward opponents | 3.1 pts toward opponents | 7.0 pts toward opponents | W 34–27 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
Sample: 42 market-covered games from 2022–25. Identified adjustments are rough sums of the Factors shown and are not a replacement betting line. Remaining gap is market consensus minus the OV baseline and identified adjustments. A push means the team’s scoring margin exactly matched the market line.