Offense#127
-9.8vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play0.05 #125 FBSSuccess rate34.7% #131 FBS
Mountain West · #125 of 138
Northern Illinois
Implied Strength-17.8vs. FBS average · ±4.4
Record0–2through completed games
Bowl Eligibility5%reach six wins
Strength of Schedule93rdof 138 FBS teams
Schedule lens
What matters next
The headline numbers are above. Here is where the season starts to take shape.
Next matchupat ArizonaWeek 3 · OV Line NIU +30 · 1% win chance →Toughest remaining test#32 ArizonaWeek 3 · 1% site win chance · View matchup →
Team identity
Where the strength lives
New head coach in 2026
Defense projects as the stronger unit by 1.8 rating points.
Defense#123
-8.0vs. FBS average
2025 PPA/play allowed0.19 #89 FBSSuccess rate allowed44.4% #109 FBS
2025 PPA (predicted points added per play) and success rate. How this split works →
Build Your Ratings
Who would win on a neutral field?
Pick the team you think is better. Your answers help build your personal ratings.
VS
Looks like you’re high on this year.
Want to explore new teams or keep comparing ?
Stored only in this browser -- nothing is sent anywhere.
Season outlook · 50,000 simulations
How Northern Illinois's 2026 could unfold
The current projection is 3–9 (2.8 expected wins), with a <0.01% chance to reach the playoff. The distribution below shows how often each regular-season win total appeared across the schedule-aware simulations.
Range of outcomes
Projected win distribution
Most common 2 winsMedian 3 winsCentral 80% 1–5 winsBowl eligible 5.3%Winless 5.3%
Simulated (schedule-aware)Central 80% rangeMarket win total
Postseason path
2026 playoff outlook
<0.01%Make the 12-team field
Still outside the median outcome across the schedule-aware simulations.
How the field is reached<0.01% total
Auto-bid<0.01%
At-large<0.01%
Outside field>99.9%
What could move the outlook
Biggest questions
Unresolved does not mean negative. A point estimate appears only when the historical evidence supports one.
How quickly does the new coaching staff take shape?
A first-year staff creates early-season implementation uncertainty even though the team-level baseline already incorporates the available preseason information.
The opener study found about a one-point market shade toward a retained coach, with a wide uncertainty range.Projection contextRoster, continuity, and market inputsView details
The market win total, returning production, coaching continuity, transfer talent, and recent NFL production help explain the evidence surrounding this projection.
Returning Production43.7%share of prior-year PPA returning for 2026
Coaching ContinuityNew HCfirst season under a new head coach
2026 Transfer Class131stof 138 FBS teams by combined portal talent
Recent NFL Draft Production126thof 138 FBS teams by NFL talent produced
Market win total3.3Consensus preseason line
Final · Sep 5Suggested side did not cover
Northern Illinois at Iowa · Iowa City, IA · Kinnick Stadium
Pregame evidence · 2022–25
Northern Illinois through the lens
The OV Line is the aggregate-rating baseline. The market gap shows where the game-level consensus differed, while identified Factors show how much of that difference our research may explain. ATS records are descriptive context—not a claim that OV should outperform the market.
Market ATS25%3–9 against consensus
Average line gap3.3 pts50% inside 3 points · 6 of 12
Factor coverage25%3 of 12 games
Factor signals75% aligned3 of 4 individual observations · 0 neutral
Historical sample12 gamesmarket-covered games from 2022–25
Explanatory history
Factors present in Northern Illinois games
| Factor | Games | Average estimate | Aligned with market | Research status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty | 2 | 3.3 pts toward Northern Illinois | 100%2 of 2 directional cases | Supported · wider uncertainty |
| Rest Differential | 2 | 0.4 pts toward Northern Illinois | 50%1 of 2 directional cases | Supported |
Underlying recordInspect all 12 historical gamesView games
| Season | Game | OV baseline | Market | Market gap | Identified adjustment | Remaining gap | Result | Market ATS | Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · W14 | vs. Kent StateHome | Northern Illinois -11.5 | Northern Illinois -5 | 6.4 pts toward opponents | None identified | 6.4 pts toward opponents | L 31–35 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W13 | vs. Western MichiganHome | Northern Illinois +2 | Northern Illinois +7 | 4.9 pts toward opponents | None identified | 4.9 pts toward opponents | L 19–35 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W12 | at MassachusettsAway | Northern Illinois -10.5 | Northern Illinois -9.5 | 0.9 pts toward opponents | None identified | 0.9 pts toward opponents | W 45–3 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W11 | at ToledoAway | Northern Illinois +18.5 | Northern Illinois +15.5 | 2.8 pts toward Northern Illinois | None identified | 2.8 pts toward Northern Illinois | L 3–42 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W9 | vs. Ball StateHome | Northern Illinois -9.5 | Northern Illinois -6.5 | 3.1 pts toward opponents | None identified | 3.1 pts toward opponents | W 21–7 | W | None identified |
| 2025 · W8 | at OhioAway | Northern Illinois +12.5 | Northern Illinois +10.5 | 2.1 pts toward Northern Illinois | 1.1 pts toward opponents | 3.2 pts toward Northern Illinois | L 21–48 | L | Rest Differential |
| 2025 · W7 | at Eastern MichiganAway | Northern Illinois +2 | Northern Illinois -1.5 | 3.4 pts toward Northern Illinois | None identified | 3.4 pts toward Northern Illinois | L 10–16 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W6 | vs. Miami (OH)Home | Northern Illinois +2.5 | Northern Illinois +4.5 | 2.0 pts toward opponents | None identified | 2.0 pts toward opponents | L 14–25 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W5 | vs. San Diego StateHome | Northern Illinois +4 | Northern Illinois +1.5 | 2.5 pts toward Northern Illinois | None identified | 2.5 pts toward Northern Illinois | L 3–6 | L | None identified |
| 2025 · W4 | at Mississippi StateAway | Northern Illinois +28.5 | Northern Illinois +24 | 4.5 pts toward Northern Illinois | 5.5 pts toward Northern Illinois | 1.0 pts toward opponents | L 10–38 | L | Lopsided Game-Flow UncertaintyRest Differential |
| 2025 · W2 | at MarylandAway | Northern Illinois +22.5 | Northern Illinois +17 | 5.5 pts toward Northern Illinois | 2.8 pts toward Northern Illinois | 2.7 pts toward Northern Illinois | L 9–20 | W | Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty |
| 2025 · W1 | vs. Holy CrossHome | Northern Illinois -14.5 | Northern Illinois -13.5 | 1.2 pts toward opponents | None identified | 1.2 pts toward opponents | W 19–17 | L | None identified |
Sample: 12 market-covered games from 2022–25. Identified adjustments are rough sums of the Factors shown and are not a replacement betting line. Remaining gap is market consensus minus the OV baseline and identified adjustments. A push means the team’s scoring margin exactly matched the market line.