Mid-American · #117 of 138

Central Michigan

Implied Strength-13.2vs. FBS average · ±4.0
Record1–1through completed games
Bowl Eligibility61%reach six wins
Strength of Schedule118thof 138 FBS teams

Schedule lens

What matters next

The headline numbers are above. Here is where the season starts to take shape.

Team identity

Where the strength lives

Defense projects as the stronger unit by 2.3 rating points.

Offense#120
-7.7vs. FBS average
-7.7
2025 PPA/play0.14 #88 FBSSuccess rate40.6% #91 FBS
Defense#104
-5.5vs. FBS average
-5.5
2025 PPA/play allowed0.08 #33 FBSSuccess rate allowed40.3% #52 FBS

2025 PPA (predicted points added per play) and success rate. How this split works →

Season outlook · 50,000 simulations

How Central Michigan's 2026 could unfold

The current projection is 6–6 (6.0 expected wins), with a <0.01% chance to reach the playoff. The distribution below shows how often each regular-season win total appeared across the schedule-aware simulations.

Range of outcomes

Projected win distribution

50,000 simulated seasons
Most common and median 6 winsCentral 80% 4–8 winsBowl eligible 61.5%
2%6%12%19%22%20%13%6%1%Market 6.3<33456789>9
Simulated (schedule-aware)Central 80% rangeMarket win total

Postseason path

2026 playoff outlook

50,000 simulations
<0.01%Make the 12-team field

Still outside the median outcome across the schedule-aware simulations.

How the field is reached<0.01% total
Auto-bid<0.01%
At-large<0.01%
Outside field>99.9%
Conference title7.2%

What could move the outlook

Biggest questions

Unresolved does not mean negative. A point estimate appears only when the historical evidence supports one.

No major preseason uncertainty signals currently clear the display threshold for Central Michigan. We will update this view as matchup and in-season evidence develops.
Projection contextRoster, continuity, and market inputsView details

The market win total, returning production, coaching continuity, transfer talent, and recent NFL production help explain the evidence surrounding this projection.

Returning Production54.0%share of prior-year PPA returning for 2026
2026 Transfer Class133rdof 138 FBS teams by combined portal talent
Recent NFL Draft Production119thof 138 FBS teams by NFL talent produced
Market win total6.3Consensus preseason line
Final · Sep 5Suggested side covered
Spread:UNM -13.5vs.UNM -11
1 Factor
Central Michigan at New Mexico · Albuquerque, NM · University Stadium (NM)
Final · Sep 12
ColgateFCS
OV Win10%10
Spread:CMU -21.5vs.
Colgate at Central Michigan · Mount Pleasant, MI · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
1:00 PM · Sep 19
Spread:PKvs.CMU -1.5
Wyoming at Central Michigan · Mount Pleasant, MI · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
6:30 PM · Sep 26
OV Win>99.9%
Spread:MIA -39vs.
Central Michigan at Miami · Miami Gardens, FL · Hard Rock Stadium
12:00 AM · Oct 3
Spread:CMU -8.5vs.
Akron at Central Michigan · Mount Pleasant, MI · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
12:00 AM · Oct 10
Spread:OHIO -4.5vs.
Central Michigan at Ohio · Athens, OH · Peden Stadium
12:00 AM · Oct 17
Spread:WMU -4vs.
Western Michigan at Central Michigan · Mount Pleasant, MI · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
12:00 AM · Oct 24
Spread:M-OH -0.5vs.
Miami (OH) at Central Michigan · Mount Pleasant, MI · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
12:00 AM · Nov 4
Spread:CMU -2vs.
Neutral site · Detroit, MI · Ford Field
12:00 AM · Nov 11
Spread:CMU -9vs.
Sacramento State at Central Michigan · Mount Pleasant, MI · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
12:00 AM · Nov 18
Spread:CMU -2vs.
Central Michigan at Buffalo · Amherst, NY · UB Stadium
12:00 PM · Nov 28
Spread:CMU -5.5vs.
Central Michigan at Ball State · Muncie, IN · Scheumann Stadium

Pregame evidence · 2022–25

Central Michigan through the lens

The OV Line is the aggregate-rating baseline. The market gap shows where the game-level consensus differed, while identified Factors show how much of that difference our research may explain. ATS records are descriptive context—not a claim that OV should outperform the market.

Market ATS64%7–4 against consensus
Average line gap3.5 pts64% inside 3 points · 7 of 11
Factor coverage45%5 of 11 games
Factor signals100% aligned4 of 4 individual observations · 1 neutral
Historical sample11 gamesmarket-covered games from 2022–25

Explanatory history

Factors present in Central Michigan games

FactorGamesAverage estimateAligned with marketResearch status
Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty33.6 pts toward Central Michigan100%3 of 3 directional casesSupported · wider uncertainty
Rest Differential11.7 pts toward Central Michigan100%1 of 1 directional casesSupported
Season Opener with a New Head Coach1No net direction0 of 0 directional casesNo separate adjustment
Underlying recordInspect all 11 historical gamesView games
SeasonGameOV baselineMarketMarket gapIdentified adjustmentRemaining gapResultMarket ATSFactors
2025 · W14vs. ToledoHomeCentral Michigan +12Central Michigan +11.50.6 pts toward Central MichiganNone identified0.6 pts toward Central MichiganL 3–21LNone identified
2025 · W13at Kent StateAwayCentral Michigan -9.5Central Michigan -7.51.8 pts toward opponentsNone identified1.8 pts toward opponentsW 28–16WNone identified
2025 · W10at Western MichiganAwayCentral Michigan +6Central Michigan +5.50.7 pts toward Central MichiganNone identified0.7 pts toward Central MichiganL 21–24WNone identified
2025 · W9vs. MassachusettsHomeCentral Michigan -18.5Central Michigan -16.51.9 pts toward opponentsNone identified1.9 pts toward opponentsW 38–13WNone identified
2025 · W8at Bowling GreenAwayCentral Michigan +5.5Central Michigan +32.6 pts toward Central Michigan1.7 pts toward Central Michigan0.9 pts toward Central MichiganW 27–6WRest Differential
2025 · W6at AkronAwayCentral Michigan -1.5Central Michigan -75.5 pts toward Central MichiganNone identified5.5 pts toward Central MichiganL 22–28LNone identified
2025 · W5vs. Eastern MichiganHomeCentral Michigan -9Central Michigan -35.8 pts toward opponentsNone identified5.8 pts toward opponentsW 24–13WNone identified
2025 · W4vs. WagnerHomeCentral Michigan -26.5Central Michigan -29.53.2 pts toward Central Michigan1.6 pts toward Central Michigan1.5 pts toward Central MichiganW 49–10WLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2025 · W3at MichiganAwayCentral Michigan +28.5Central Michigan +27.50.9 pts toward Central Michigan3.7 pts toward Central Michigan2.8 pts toward opponentsL 3–63LLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2025 · W2at PittsburghAwayCentral Michigan +37.5Central Michigan +21.516.0 pts toward Central Michigan5.5 pts toward Central Michigan10.5 pts toward Central MichiganL 17–45LLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2025 · W1at San José StateAwayCentral Michigan +14.5Central Michigan +14.50.1 pts toward opponentsNo net direction0.1 pts toward opponentsW 16–14WSeason Opener with a New Head Coach

Sample: 11 market-covered games from 2022–25. Identified adjustments are rough sums of the Factors shown and are not a replacement betting line. Remaining gap is market consensus minus the OV baseline and identified adjustments. A push means the team’s scoring margin exactly matched the market line.