Mid-American · #131 of 138

Akron

Implied Strength-19.0vs. FBS average · ±3.9
Record1–1through completed games
Bowl Eligibility25%reach six wins
Strength of Schedule122ndof 138 FBS teams

Schedule lens

What matters next

The headline numbers are above. Here is where the season starts to take shape.

Team identity

Where the strength lives

The model sees a balanced team, with neither unit separating meaningfully from the other.

Offense#128
-9.9vs. FBS average
-9.9
2025 PPA/play0.07 #117 FBSSuccess rate39.5% #107 FBS
Defense#125
-9.1vs. FBS average
-9.1
2025 PPA/play allowed0.15 #60 FBSSuccess rate allowed40.3% #53 FBS

2025 PPA (predicted points added per play) and success rate. How this split works →

Season outlook · 50,000 simulations

How Akron's 2026 could unfold

The current projection is 4–8 (4.4 expected wins), with a <0.01% chance to reach the playoff. The distribution below shows how often each regular-season win total appeared across the schedule-aware simulations.

Range of outcomes

Projected win distribution

50,000 simulated seasons
Most common and median 4 winsCentral 80% 2–7 winsBowl eligible 24.8%
3%10%18%23%21%14%7%3%Market 4.5<2234567>7
Simulated (schedule-aware)Central 80% rangeMarket win total

Postseason path

2026 playoff outlook

50,000 simulations
<0.01%Make the 12-team field

Still outside the median outcome across the schedule-aware simulations.

How the field is reached<0.01% total
Auto-bid<0.01%
At-large<0.01%
Outside field>99.9%
Conference title1.3%

What could move the outlook

Biggest questions

Unresolved does not mean negative. A point estimate appears only when the historical evidence supports one.

No major preseason uncertainty signals currently clear the display threshold for Akron. We will update this view as matchup and in-season evidence develops.
Projection contextRoster, continuity, and market inputsView details

The market win total, returning production, coaching continuity, transfer talent, and recent NFL production help explain the evidence surrounding this projection.

Returning Production91.8%share of prior-year PPA returning for 2026
2026 Transfer Class107thof 138 FBS teams by combined portal talent
Recent NFL Draft Production131stof 138 FBS teams by NFL talent produced
Market win total4.5Consensus preseason line
Final · Sep 3Suggested side covered
Spread:WAKE -23vs.WAKE -28
1 Factor
Akron at Wake Forest · Winston-Salem, NC · Allegacy Federal Credit Union Stadium
Final · Sep 12
Robert MorrisFCS
OV Win5%10
OV Win95%45
Spread:AKR -25vs.
Robert Morris at Akron · Akron, OH · InfoCision Stadium
11:00 AM · Sep 19
Spread:MINN -27.5vs.MINN -24
Akron at Minnesota · Minneapolis, MN · Huntington Bank Stadium
12:00 PM · Sep 26
Spread:UNLV -12.5vs.
UNLV at Akron · Akron, OH · InfoCision Stadium
12:00 AM · Oct 3
Spread:CMU -8.5vs.
Akron at Central Michigan · Mount Pleasant, MI · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
3:30 PM · Oct 10
Spread:EMU -1.5vs.
Eastern Michigan at Akron · Akron, OH · InfoCision Stadium
12:00 AM · Oct 17
Spread:M-OH -11.5vs.
Akron at Miami (OH) · Oxford, OH · Yager Stadium
12:00 AM · Oct 24
Spread:AKR -0.5vs.
Akron at Kent State · Kent, OH · Dix Stadium
7:00 PM · Nov 3
Spread:OHIO -5vs.
Ohio at Akron · Akron, OH · InfoCision Stadium
7:00 PM · Nov 10
Spread:WMU -10vs.
Western Michigan at Akron · Akron, OH · InfoCision Stadium
12:00 AM · Nov 18
Spread:AKR -3.5vs.
Akron at Massachusetts · Hadley, MA · Warren McGuirk Alumni Stadium
12:00 PM · Nov 27
Spread:AKR -1.5vs.
Buffalo at Akron · Akron, OH · InfoCision Stadium

Pregame evidence · 2022–25

Akron through the lens

The OV Line is the aggregate-rating baseline. The market gap shows where the game-level consensus differed, while identified Factors show how much of that difference our research may explain. ATS records are descriptive context—not a claim that OV should outperform the market.

Market ATS45%5–6 against consensus
Average line gap3.4 pts55% inside 3 points · 6 of 11
Factor coverage27%3 of 11 games
Factor signals67% aligned2 of 3 individual observations · 0 neutral
Historical sample11 gamesmarket-covered games from 2022–25

Explanatory history

Factors present in Akron games

FactorGamesAverage estimateAligned with marketResearch status
Lopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty24.1 pts toward Akron100%2 of 2 directional casesSupported · wider uncertainty
Rest Differential10.5 pts toward opponents0%0 of 1 directional casesSupported
Underlying recordInspect all 11 historical gamesView games
SeasonGameOV baselineMarketMarket gapIdentified adjustmentRemaining gapResultMarket ATSFactors
2025 · W13at Bowling GreenAwayAkron +8Akron +2.55.5 pts toward Akron0.5 pts toward opponents6.0 pts toward AkronW 19–16WRest Differential
2025 · W12vs. Kent StateHomeAkron -9.5Akron -7.52.1 pts toward opponentsNone identified2.1 pts toward opponentsL 35–42LNone identified
2025 · W11vs. MassachusettsHomeAkron -11Akron -12.51.4 pts toward AkronNone identified1.4 pts toward AkronW 44–10WNone identified
2025 · W8at Ball StateAwayAkron +5Akron -27.2 pts toward AkronNone identified7.2 pts toward AkronL 28–42LNone identified
2025 · W7vs. Miami (OH)HomeAkron +10Akron +11.51.6 pts toward opponentsNone identified1.6 pts toward opponentsL 7–20LNone identified
2025 · W6vs. Central MichiganHomeAkron +1.5Akron +75.5 pts toward opponentsNone identified5.5 pts toward opponentsW 28–22WNone identified
2025 · W5at ToledoAwayAkron +25.5Akron +21.54.1 pts toward Akron3.3 pts toward Akron0.8 pts toward AkronL 3–45LLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2025 · W4vs. DuquesneHomeAkron -4Akron -10.56.6 pts toward AkronNone identified6.6 pts toward AkronW 51–7WNone identified
2025 · W3at UABAwayAkron +13Akron +12.50.3 pts toward AkronNone identified0.3 pts toward AkronL 28–31WNone identified
2025 · W2at NebraskaAwayAkron +35Akron +341.0 pts toward Akron5.0 pts toward Akron3.9 pts toward opponentsL 0–68LLopsided Game-Flow Uncertainty
2025 · W1vs. WyomingHomeAkron +7Akron +52.0 pts toward AkronNone identified2.0 pts toward AkronL 0–10LNone identified

Sample: 11 market-covered games from 2022–25. Identified adjustments are rough sums of the Factors shown and are not a replacement betting line. Remaining gap is market consensus minus the OV baseline and identified adjustments. A push means the team’s scoring margin exactly matched the market line.